Defense News present\u00f3 el 2022 \u201cTop 100\u201d Ranking de las compa\u00f1\u00edas globales del \u00e1rea de Defensa y Aeroespacial. Pese a las restricciones relacionadas con el COVID-19 y los efectos directos y remanentes sufridos por la cadena de suministros e infraestructura productiva, los ingresos por ventas de estas compa\u00f1\u00edas han crecido en el ejercicio fiscal 2021 por 6t0 a\u00f1o consecutivo. El total de ingresos consolidado de las \u201cTop 100\u201des de US$ 595.000 Millones, con un 8% de incremento respecto del a\u00f1o anterior. Las \u201cTop 10\u201dacumulan un 52% del ingreso total y las \u201cTop 25\u201d un 75% del mismo, lo cual da una idea de la concentraci\u00f3n de los recursos, en un reducido grupo de pa\u00edses y Holdings empresarios. En el \u201cTop 10\u201d hay 6 empresas de EUA, 3 de China y 1 de UK. M\u00e1s all\u00e1 de las grandes potencias, pa\u00edses como Israel, Corea del Sur, India, Turqu\u00eda y Brasil, han logrado posicionar compa\u00f1\u00edas en el listado. El informe aclara adem\u00e1s, que algunas empresas de determinados pa\u00edses, no han aportado la informaci\u00f3n necesaria para este reporte.<\/p>\n
Defense News\u2019 Top 100 list<\/a>\u00a0remains a valuable data set in assessing how global defense contractors have \u2014 or have not \u2014 changed. Absent are most major Russian contractors, and some others are regrettably not included, notably SpaceX, General Atomics and Edge Group. Also regrettable is that some firms do not appear to have responded to Defense News\u2019 request for data.<\/p>\n In reviewing the data that is available in this year\u2019s Top 100, there are some takeaways and trends to consider.<\/p>\n Lockheed Martin again is ranked No. 1. Defense News\u2019 data back to the 2003 list shows Lockheed Martin has consistently held that position. The ratio of its defense revenue to the No. 2 contractor listed, which for fiscal 2021 was Raytheon Technologies, was 1.5, which is slightly more than the 2003-2020 average of 1.4.<\/p>\n See the Top 100 list here<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n Barring another major merger or acquisition deal among the other top 10 contractors, or even a breakup of Lockheed Martin, it\u2019s difficult to see how organic sales growth alone could knock Lockheed from it\u2019s top position anytime soon.<\/p>\n Total FY21 defense revenue of the Top 100 is $595 billion, up 9% from the total FY20 defense revenue on this latest list. Of the approximate $53 billion increase, Chinese defense contractors accounted for $19 billion.<\/p>\n Twenty-two of the firms listed experienced negative comparisons of defense revenue on FY21 compared to FY20, but some of those declines can be explained by divestitures of defense operations. Similarly, acquisitions also contributed to defense revenue growth at BAE Systems, Leidos and Peraton, among others.<\/p>\n The Boeing defense revenue increase of about $2.7 billion stands out because the company reported $26.5 billion in 2021 revenue for its Defense, Space and Security segment. In 2020, it reported $26.3 billion in revenue for this segment. Boeing does not report defense and commercial revenue in its Global Services segment, so it must have had a much stronger defense contribution in FY21 than FY20.<\/p>\n The data shows that globally, the contractors are fragmented. That may not be the case in individual country markets where there are national champions and some segments are more concentrated than others. The top 10 contractors for FY21 accounted for 52% of defense revenue for the Top 100. That\u2019s a bit lower than the average of 56% reported in the 2003-2020 data sets.<\/p>\n There has most certainly been consolidation, notably in the U.S. sector, but then there are new emerging global competitors and national champions. South Korea\u2019s defense contractors are more active in markets outside of Asia, and this has been underscored by\u00a0recent defense sales announced to Poland<\/a>. The inclusion of Polish Armaments Group and Saudi Arabian Military Industries are other manifestations of this trend.<\/p>\n For all the focus on defense innovation and the emphasis on broadening defense-industrial bases, a glaring absence of the list are new entrants. Possibly, SpaceX could be included, but while there are some U.S. defense \u201cunicorns\u201d with $1 billion valuations, their sales are still far below the $600 million level that\u2019s the entry threshold to the Top 100.<\/p>\n It\u2019s probable that the Top 100 will see larger defense revenue figures in FY22 and beyond. Defense spending growth in Europe, the U.S. and Asia is increasing, and so too will contractor sales. Mega defense mergers are unlikely, particularly in the U.S., given the\u00a0Biden administration\u2019s focus on competition<\/a>, and action on the\u00a0Lockheed Martin-Aerojet Rocketdyne merger<\/a>\u00a0signaled tougher stances on vertical integration.<\/p>\n However, smaller deals are likely to continue, and so there could be more churn in the lower 50 of the Top 100. The largest contractors will likely continue to assess their optimal portfolio mixes, and divestitures will continue.<\/p>\n