{"id":17287,"date":"2025-07-15T08:37:06","date_gmt":"2025-07-15T11:37:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/?p=17287"},"modified":"2025-07-15T08:37:06","modified_gmt":"2025-07-15T11:37:06","slug":"reformas-del-pentagono-permiten-considerar-a-los-drones-pequenos-como-material-de-consumo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/?p=17287","title":{"rendered":"Reformas del Pent\u00e1gono permiten considerar a los drones peque\u00f1os como material de consumo"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sobre la base de la experiencia obtenida con el empleo masivo de drones en la guerra de Ucrania, el Secretario de Defensa (DoD) de EUA promulg\u00f3 una Directiva que permite a sus FFAA, considerar a los peque\u00f1os UAV como material de consumo, en lugar de bienes de uso. A partir de ahora, todos los drones con un peso de hasta 25 kg ser\u00e1n considerados como \u201cconsumibles\u201d, por similitud a la munici\u00f3n. Esta transformaci\u00f3n se asemeja al formato que adopta Ucrania, donde una brigada en combate consume 30 \/ 50 drones FPV diarios, resultando una carga burocr\u00e1tica imposible, tener que realizar una investigaci\u00f3n espec\u00edfica sobre cada drone perdido \/ utilizado, como hasta ahora se hace en las FFAA de EUA. \u201dLa letalidad no puede ser obstaculizada por restricciones autoimpuestas. Nuestro mayor riesgo, es la aversi\u00f3n al riesgo<\/em>\u201d, expres\u00f3 la m\u00e1xima autoridad del DoD.<\/p>\n

\n

In a watershed moment for military procurement, Hegseth signed directives rescinding restrictive drone policies established in 2021-2022, declaring that “lethality will not be hindered by self-imposed restrictions” and that “our major risk is risk-avoidance.”<\/p>\n

\"\"
Hegseth (gstatic.com)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The reforms represent the Pentagon’s most dramatic policy shift in years: reclassifying small drones (under 55 pounds) as consumable items rather than tracked assets, empowering colonels and captains to independently purchase and deploy drones, and establishing a streamlined “Blue List” of approved vendors updated monthly instead of quarterly.<\/p>\n

“This isn’t merely administrative reshuffling,” noted a senior defense analyst who requested anonymity. “It’s a fundamental reconceptualization of warfare itself, treating intelligent aircraft as expendable munitions rather than precious platforms.”<\/p>\n

Lessons From Ukraine’s Drone-Saturated Battlefields<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

The Pentagon’s transformation draws directly from Ukraine’s innovative use of commercial drones against Russian forces. Ukrainian brigades typically lose 30-50 first-person-view drones daily\u2014a consumption rate that would have been bureaucratically impossible under previous Pentagon rules requiring formal investigations for each lost aircraft.<\/p>\n

“The Russia-Ukraine conflict revealed our procurement blind spot,” explained a defense technology consultant familiar with the reforms. “While we debated policy nuances, our adversaries flooded battlefields with millions of cheap, effective drones. Hegseth’s reforms address this asymmetry head-on.”<\/p>\n

Wall Street’s Drone Fever Takes Flight<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Financial markets reacted immediately to Thursday’s announcement. Shares of drone manufacturers skyrocketed in Friday trading: industry leader Kratos Defense surged 11.76% to $51.71, AeroVironment jumped 11% to $263.80, while microcap ZenaTech soared 19.5% to $5.03.<\/p>\n

The reforms effectively unlock $2-3 billion previously trapped in bureaucratic processes, creating what analysts describe as a “high-velocity, multi-billion-dollar buyer” of inexpensive, AI-enabled aircraft. Conservative estimates place the addressable market at $3.4 billion by 2026, with aggressive projections reaching $6.1 billion.<\/p>\n

From Paperwork to Battlefield in 24 Hours<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Perhaps most revolutionary is the delegation of purchasing authority to field commanders\u2014colonels and captains can now independently procure, test, and deploy drones provided they meet basic security standards.<\/p>\n

“The previous system required multiple Pentagon approvals for even small drone purchases,” said a military procurement specialist. “Now a colonel can identify a need in the morning and have drones delivered to the field the next day.”<\/p>\n

Commanders will have immediate access to operation and maintenance funds plus expedited Working Capital Fund lines, with dedicated drone program offices mandated by September 2025.<\/p>\n

Silicon Meets Steel: Tech Industry Transformation<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

The reforms explicitly encourage local innovation including 3D-printed components, creating opportunities beyond traditional defense contractors. Market analysts point to potential second-order beneficiaries: additive manufacturing companies (Stratasys, 3D Systems), edge AI chip producers (NVIDIA, AMD, Lattice), satellite communications providers (Iridium, SES), composite materials manufacturers (Hexcel, Toray), and counter-drone technology firms.<\/p>\n

“This creates an entirely new industrial ecosystem,” observed a technology sector analyst. “The velocity of spending\u2014not just the total amount\u2014will reshape defense equity cash-flow profiles, potentially generating quarterly sales spikes historically rare in defense.”<\/p>\n

The Nano-Cap Wildcards<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

While established players like Kratos (market cap: $8.1 billion) and AeroVironment ($7.4 billion) appear well-positioned, market specialists suggest the most dramatic upside may lie with smaller specialists like ZenaTech ($420 million) and Red Cat Holdings ($800 million).<\/p>\n

“KTOS trades at a premium 5.8\u00d7 EV\/Sales multiple, reflecting its near-monopoly on attritable jet engines,” noted an investment strategist. “However, the asymmetric opportunity exists in sub-$10 names that could quintuple sales without stretching balance sheets, particularly those offering drone-as-a-service models that align with commander-level operational budgets.”<\/p>\n

Hidden Risks Beneath the Hype<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Despite the bullish outlook, analysts identify several potential pitfalls: margin compression as prices trend downward, certification risks for companies with weak cybersecurity, budget offset pressure on manned aviation programs, and industrial bottlenecks for components still sourced from Asia.<\/p>\n

“The memo converts drones from capital equipment to smart ammunition, which fundamentally alters their investment profile,” said a veteran aerospace analyst. “Companies capable of protecting margins through proprietary AI and software will likely outperform pure hardware providers facing commoditization pressure.”<\/p>\n

Investment Horizon: Navigating the Drone Boom<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

For investors considering exposure to this sector transformation, analysts suggest several approaches: structural long positions in U.S. small-drone makers (potentially hedged against broader defense sector ETFs), relative value trades favoring edge-AI providers over pure airframe manufacturers, and opportunistic purchases of companies like AeroVironment following capital raises.<\/p>\n

Key catalysts to monitor include the first commander-level bulk purchases expected September 1st, the DCMA’s inaugural vendor ratings in Q4 2025, FY-26 NDAA conference outcomes in January 2026, and major procurement awards anticipated in the second half of 2026.<\/p>\n

Fuente: <\/strong>https:\/\/www.ctol.digital<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sobre la base de la experiencia obtenida con el empleo masivo de drones en la guerra de Ucrania, el Secretario de Defensa (DoD) de EUA… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17289,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[18,2,37,28],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17287"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17287"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17287\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17290,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17287\/revisions\/17290"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17289"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17287"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17287"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}