{"id":2976,"date":"2018-05-16T11:38:08","date_gmt":"2018-05-16T14:38:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nachodelatorre.com.ar\/mosconi\/?p=2976"},"modified":"2018-05-16T11:38:08","modified_gmt":"2018-05-16T14:38:08","slug":"el-us-marines-y-su-vehiculo-de-combate-futuro","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/?p=2976","title":{"rendered":"El US Marines y su veh\u00edculo de combate futuro"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><u><\/u>EL Cuerpo de Marines de EUA considera un aspecto vital el desarrollo de su nuevo veh\u00edculo de Exploraci\u00f3n, para operaciones terrestres futuras. El proyecto denominado\u00a0<strong>Armored Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV),<\/strong>\u00a0requiere un sistema capaz de operar en un ambiente cada vez m\u00e1s tecnificado, pero tambi\u00e9n cada vez m\u00e1s hostil. Este veh\u00edculo deber\u00e1 ser capaz de incursionar profundamente en territorio enemigo, en funciones de reconocimiento y exploraci\u00f3n.\u00a0<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>WASHINGTON: By 2023, the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2018\/05\/marines-reorganize-infantry-for-high-tech-war-fewer-riflemen-more-drones\/\">Marine Corps<\/a>\u00a0wants prototypes for a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2018\/02\/drones-ro-boats-f-35-on-wheels-marines-seek-tech-for-major-war\/\">radically new scout unit<\/a>\u00a0they want to be the ground version of the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2018\/02\/upgrade-navy-networks-to-get-most-from-f-35-commandant-wants-quality\/\">F-35<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 scouting ahead into hostile territory, killing key targets, and feeding data back to the rest of the force. Though called the Armored Reconnaissance Vehicle, the project has evolved well beyond a straightforward replacement for the aging Light Armored Vehicle (LAV) into a networked family of manned vehicles,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2018\/04\/allies-must-develop-own-robots-not-just-copy-us-aussie-war-college-chief\/\">ground robots<\/a>, and drones, collectively capable of not only reconnaissance but also\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2018\/04\/russia-widens-ew-war-disabling-ec-130s-in-syria\/\">electronic warfare<\/a>\u00a0and long-range precision strikes.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-32454\" src=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/10\/LAV-25-USMC-120127-M-OO345-071-300x200.jpg\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/10\/LAV-25-USMC-120127-M-OO345-071-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/10\/LAV-25-USMC-120127-M-OO345-071-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/10\/LAV-25-USMC-120127-M-OO345-071-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" alt=\"Marine Corps photo\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Industry response has been overwhelming. Interested companies have submitted some 282 white papers and counting, deputy commandant\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.mccdc.marines.mil\/Portals\/172\/Docs\/MCCDC\/young\/MCCDC-YH\/Lieutenant%20General%20Walsh.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Lt. Gen. Robert Walsh<\/a>\u00a0said last week. These aren\u2019t just traditional prime contractors proposing manned vehicles, but a host of smaller companies proposing also unmanned systems, sensors, networks, EW, weapons, and more, Walsh and his staff said. The Office of Naval Research (ONR), which is running the $42 million science, technology, and prototyping effort for the Marines, has actually had to push back deadlines to sort through this embarrassment of riches.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s a stark contrast to the Marines\u2019 first stab at the Armored Reconnaissance Vehicle, when a small number of big contractors proposed modest improvements on the 1980s-vintage LAV. \u201cThe reason we did this (i.e. reboot the program and work with ONR): I wasn\u2019t seeing the bright ideas coming from industry,\u201d Walsh said.<\/p>\n<p>By contrast, the former fighter pilot said, \u201cI could see it on F-35,\u201d which started in the 1990s as a stealthy strike fighter but has evolved into an electronic\/cyber warfare platform that can gather and \u201cfuse\u201d a vast amount of data to guide the rest of the force. Walsh wanted to see the same ferment of new tactics and technologies for ground reconnaissance. Now, by all accounts, he\u2019s getting it.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-44729\" src=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2018\/05\/Screen-Shot-2018-05-01-at-4.00.21-PM.png\" sizes=\"(max-width: 919px) 100vw, 919px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2018\/05\/Screen-Shot-2018-05-01-at-4.00.21-PM.png 919w, https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2018\/05\/Screen-Shot-2018-05-01-at-4.00.21-PM-300x193.png 300w, https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2018\/05\/Screen-Shot-2018-05-01-at-4.00.21-PM-768x493.png 768w\" alt=\"Marine Corps graphic\" width=\"474\" height=\"304\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Big Ambitions<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Marines have big ambitions for the ARV. \u201cThe vehicle should be able to launch a UAS (Unmanned Aerial System), scout deep, and then use precision fires (and) electronic warfare,\u201d Walsh said last week. Speaking, at the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.modularopensystems.com\/agenda\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Modular Open Systems Summit<\/a>, he emphasized the importance of an\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2017\/10\/speedier-software-upgrades-for-army-vehicles-open-architecture\/\">open architecture<\/a>\u00a0design that could be \u201cconstantly\u201d upgraded with new technologies as they become available.<\/p>\n<p>What kinds of technologies? His staff and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.onr.navy.mil\/Conference-Event-ONR\/ARV-industry-day\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">online materials<\/a>\u00a0for a January 9 industry day lay out a long wishlist:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the ability to operate for extended periods with\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2018\/03\/drone-delivery-direct-to-the-grunt-marines-experiment-with-hive-uavs\/\">minimal resupply<\/a>, part of the emerging Army and Marine Corps focus on \u201cdistributed operations\u201d where units disperse and keep on the move to avoid presenting easy targets for precision strikes.<\/li>\n<li>better amphibious performance than the current LAV while remaining as easy to transport on\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2017\/10\/marines-need-speed-from-ship-to-shore\/\">landing craft<\/a>\u00a0(four vehicles per LCAC hovercraft).<\/li>\n<li>an arsenal of medium-caliber automatic cannon (e.g.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=t8Q2DqB8b2Q\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">30 mm<\/a>) for lightly armored targets, anti-armor firepower for heavy tanks, long-range missiles (the Israeli Spike) or kamikaze drones (Switchblade) for targets over the horizon, and some means to shoot down enemy drones. (The systems in parentheses were listed in the industry day briefings as examples, not mandates).<\/li>\n<li>advanced long-range sensors and a secure communications network to share the data they collect, even in the face of enemy jamming and hacking.<\/li>\n<li>electronic warfare capability to detect, classify, and jam enemy transmissions, to include downing drones by scrambling their control links.<\/li>\n<li>Active Protection Systems, like the Israeli\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2018\/03\/trophy-aps-the-best-defense-is-shooting-back\/\">Trophy APS<\/a>\u00a0now being studied by the Army, to shoot down incoming anti-tank warheads before they hit, as well as unspecified counter-IED (Improvised Explosive Device) defenses.<\/li>\n<li>passenger capacity for scouts who can dismount and fight on foot (the current LAV carries six, but the number for ARV is not yet fixed).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Now, not all of this equipment has to fit on one vehicle. Even the current LAV exists in\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/nationalinterest.org\/blog\/the-buzz\/the-lav-25-what-you-need-know-about-the-us-marines-little-21795\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">multiple variants<\/a>\u00a0for different missions: armed troop carrier, mobile command post, mortar carrier, anti-tank, anti-aircraft, and so on. The future ARV, likewise, will be the basis of \u201cNext Generation Armored Reconnaissance Family of Vehicles,\u201d the briefing materials say. And those vehicles will be accompanied by multiple types of unmanned air and ground vehicles, including a small (Group 1) recon\/kamikaze drone and larger (Group 3) drones for long-range recon and to air-drop mini-robots to scout targets at ground level.<\/p>\n<p>This kind of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2017\/06\/marine-airpowers-future-networking-f-35s-v-22s-mux-drones\/\">complex integration of different systems<\/a>, emphasizing different ways to gather information, is increasingly typical of US defense programs, not just in the Marine Corps. \u201cThe general approach reflects a consistent theme across the services, i.e. attempts to leverage modern technologies involving sensors, communications, and information fusing\/analysis to make operators more aware of their environment and forces more effective in general,\u201d said Dakota Wood, a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.heritage.org\/staff\/dakota-wood\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">retired Marine<\/a>\u00a0now with the Heritage Foundation. \u201cWhether that can be done at acceptable cost and in a reasonable period of time remains to be seen.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-41704\" src=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2018\/01\/PUB_FCS_Constellation_2006_lg.jpg\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2018\/01\/PUB_FCS_Constellation_2006_lg.jpg 800w, https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2018\/01\/PUB_FCS_Constellation_2006_lg-300x188.jpg 300w, https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2018\/01\/PUB_FCS_Constellation_2006_lg-768x480.jpg 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"525\" height=\"328\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Can They Do It?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Can the Marine Corps, the smallest service, pull together all these disparate technologies into a successful program? With its plan for a family of manned vehicles supported by drones and ground robots, all networked together to share data, the Armored Reconnaissance Vehicle sounds a little like the Army\u2019s cancelled\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2018\/01\/csa-miiley-bets-on-radical-tech-promises-no-more-fcs\/\">Future Combat Systems<\/a>, which has become a byword for overreach.<\/p>\n<p>ARV looks a lot more likely to succeed, however, said one experienced observer of ground force modernization programs. \u201cIt\u2019s much less ambitious than FCS, though, and it will be bought in fairly small numbers,\u201d the source said. The Marines only aim to buy 500 ARVs \u2014 plus associated drones and robots \u2014 which is a relatively small number for a defense program.<\/p>\n<p>On a technical level, the source said, \u201ca wheeled vehicle is much less ambitious (than a tracked one as in FCS),\u201d and that\u2019s what the Marines will probably build. There are plenty of wheeled armored vehicles available on the market today, including the Army\u2019s 8\u00d78\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2017\/10\/army-accelerates-armor-stryker-trophy-mpf-race-to-field\/\">Stryker<\/a>, itself the big brother of the Marines\u2019 LAV, in turn a descendant of the Swiss MOWAG Piranha.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2016\/09\/bae-unveils-1st-amphibious-combat-vehicle-for-marines\/\">Italian<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2017\/03\/saic-singaporeans-challenge-bae-for-marine-corps-acv-contract-tests-to-begin\/\">Singaporean<\/a>\u00a0designs are currently competing for the Marines\u2019\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/tag\/acv\/\">Amphibious Combat Vehicle<\/a>\u00a0(ACV, not to be confused with ARV or for that matter AAV). All these vehicles are basically bulletproof boxes capable of being reconfigured for a wide range of missions, so the ARV program doesn\u2019t need to invent some radically new vehicle to carry its capabilities, as FCS tried to.<\/p>\n<p>Likewise, there are a lot of different drones available that can perform the missions called for in the ARV briefing materials. Ground robotics aren\u2019t as advanced, but at least the Marines are only looking at scout bots, rather than\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2017\/07\/should-pentagon-let-robots-kill-humans-maybe\/\">armed remote-controlled vehicles<\/a>\u00a0as in the Army\u2019s\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/tag\/ngcv\/\">Next Generation Combat Vehicle<\/a>\u00a0program.<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s more, while the Army wants to get its first prototype NGCVs in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2018\/03\/army-wants-combat-robot-prototype-by-2019-cft-chief\/\">2019<\/a>\u00a0(with tests running through\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2018\/03\/skeptics-ask-can-army-field-armed-robots-by-2024\/\">2024<\/a>), the Marines don\u2019t plan to get prototype ARVs until late 2023 (tests will run through 2025). Low-rate initial production of the first 50 vehicles will run from 2026-2027, at which point the first ARV unit will reach Initial Operational Capability (IOC). Full rate production of the remaining 450 vehicles will run through 2032.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-20119\" src=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2015\/04\/Walsh-MG-Robert-USMC-72.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"197\" height=\"246\" \/><\/p>\n<p>\u201cCould we go faster? We absolutely could faster\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2018\/04\/marine-corps-braces-for-2020-budget-cuts-gen-neller\/\">if the money was there<\/a>,\u201d Walsh told reporters. But in the early 2020s, he said, \u201cwe\u2019re bringing on ACV, we\u2019re bringing on\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/tag\/joint-light-tactical-vehicle\/\">JLTV<\/a>. We\u2019ve got to get through those things\u201d before taking on another ground modernization program.<\/p>\n<p>That tentative timeline \u2014 still fairly fast as defense procurements go \u2014 gives the Marines eight years to work out the technology. What\u2019s more, the plan is to build two sets of tech demonstrators: one using low-risk, off-the-shelf technology wherever possible, one pushing the envelope in quest of a \u201crevolutionary\u201d improvement. Neither prototype will have to carry the full range of capabilities: Instead, Walsh and his staff said, the objective is to develop \u201c80 percent solutions\u201d designed with an open architecture that will allow easy upgrades in the future, both to improve the baseline ARV and to develop new specialized variants.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s important to explore a wide range of options and not lock down requirements too early, Walsh said. (By contrast, FCS set precise objectives and only then looked to see if they were possible). \u201cWe\u2019re trying to solve the problem of what is reconnaissance (and) counter-reconnaissance in the future,\u201d he said, not simply replace an old vehicle with a new one.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf we went to the primes today that build vehicles, they would build a certain box for us and say, \u2018this is what we can do,&#8217;\u201d Walsh told the modular systems conference. \u201cWhen you open it up to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/tag\/industrial-base\/\">lots of people<\/a>, you\u2019re going to come up with\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/tag\/innovation\/\">lots of different ideas<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Fuente:<\/strong>\u00a0<em><a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2018\/05\/marines-want-armored-recon-prototypes-by-2023-f-35-on-wheels-or-fcs-redux\/?utm_campaign=Raytheon%20Space%20Symposium%20&amp;utm_source=hs_email&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_content=62841002&amp;_hsenc=p2ANqtz--CWw3NOl5z_MG9gABgfUvu-jexw9XuRugbeWM2cIV5TOq2F-P-xDBNJM2lvpFrHAmIL-k6vQY6t-UKv6E3F0MuMG2ETA&amp;_hsmi=62841002\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/breakingdefense.com<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>EL Cuerpo de Marines de EUA considera un aspecto vital el desarrollo de su nuevo veh\u00edculo de Exploraci\u00f3n, para operaciones terrestres futuras. El proyecto denominado\u00a0Armored&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[18,11,29],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2976"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2976"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2976\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2976"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2976"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2976"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}