{"id":4534,"date":"2019-10-15T09:21:16","date_gmt":"2019-10-15T12:21:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nachodelatorre.com.ar\/mosconi\/?p=4534"},"modified":"2019-10-15T09:21:16","modified_gmt":"2019-10-15T12:21:16","slug":"elijen-vehiculo-para-el-peloton-de-infanteria-del-us-army","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/?p=4534","title":{"rendered":"Elijen veh\u00edculo para el pelot\u00f3n de infanter\u00eda del US Army"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #464646; font-family: fira_sansregular, serif;\">Tres equipos muy diferentes compiten para construir el Veh\u00edculo del Escuadr\u00f3n de Infanter\u00eda del Ej\u00e9rcito, un\u00a0veh\u00edculo\u00a0\u00a0lo suficientemente resistente como para lanzarse en paraca\u00eddas desde un avi\u00f3n y luego alejarse\u00a0 a campo traviesa\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0con nueve soldados de infanter\u00eda fuertemente armados.\u00a0Para el 13 de noviembre, cada equipo\u00a0presentara\u00a0\u00a0al Ej\u00e9rcito dos veh\u00edculos para realizar pruebas, y el ganador recibir\u00e1 un contrato (inicial) para 651 vehiculos\u00a0 el pr\u00f3ximo a\u00f1o.\u00a0\u00a0Compiten Oshkosh &#8211; Flyer\u00a0 ; Polaris y SAIC\u00a0 y GM Defense.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>WASHINGTON: Three very different teams are vying to build the Army\u2019s Infantry Squad Vehicle, a truck tough enough to parachute out of an airplane and then\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2015\/06\/21177\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">drive away cross-country<\/a>\u00a0with nine heavily armed infantrymen. By Nov. 13th, each team owes the Army two vehicles for testing, with the winner getting a contract for 651 ISVs next year.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s meet the players.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-78893\" src=\"https:\/\/sites.breakingmedia.com\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2019\/10\/Oshkosh-ISV_1-1024x576.jpg\" sizes=\"(max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.breakingmedia.com\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2019\/10\/Oshkosh-ISV_1-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/sites.breakingmedia.com\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2019\/10\/Oshkosh-ISV_1-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/sites.breakingmedia.com\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2019\/10\/Oshkosh-ISV_1-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/sites.breakingmedia.com\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2019\/10\/Oshkosh-ISV_1-210x118.jpg 210w\" alt=\"Oshkosh photo\" width=\"720\" height=\"405\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/oshkoshdefense.com\/oshkosh-defense-and-flyer-defense-receive-task-assignment-to-develop-infantry-squad-vehicle-isv\/\">Oshkosh-Flyer team<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0is the closest thing to an incumbent in the competition. The Army had earlier\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2015\/05\/big-company-small-vehicle-what-odds-general-dynamics-offers-flyer-for-ulcv\/\">picked the Flyer-72<\/a>\u00a0as an\u00a0<em>interim<\/em>\u00a0air-droppable transport, the A-GMV, and Flyer is offering an upgraded version for the follow-on program, ISV. Actual mass production will be done by Oshkosh, which makes a host of Army trucks \u2014 most prominently, the beefed-up successor to the Humvee, the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2019\/10\/a-new-nato-buyer-for-jltv-more-buyers-on-the-way\/\">Joint Light Tactical Vehicle<\/a>\u00a0(JLTV), which the Army and Marine Corps plan to buy\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2019\/06\/jltv-army-approves-full-rate-production-despite-doubts\/\">over 50,000<\/a>\u00a0of in the coming decades.<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s more, Oshkosh plans to build the 5,000-pound ISV on the same assembly line as all its other vehicles, from the 14,000-lb JLTV to 10-ton\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/oshkoshdefense.com\/vehicles\/fmtv\/\">FMTV<\/a>\u00a0dump trucks. (The earlier version of the Flyer-72 was mass-produced by\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2015\/05\/big-company-small-vehicle-what-odds-general-dynamics-offers-flyer-for-ulcv\/\">General Dynamics<\/a>). The ISV will be the lightest vehicle on the Oshkosh line, VP\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/oshkoshdefense.com\/media\/bios\/\">George Mansfield<\/a>\u00a0told me, but the company is confident it can build the air-droppable trucks more affordably than Flyer could \u2014 and at least as well. In fact, Mansfield said, he expects the Oshkosh-built version to be\u00a0<em>more\u00a0<\/em>reliable. That\u2019s in part because of Oshkosh\u2019s manufacturing expertise \u2014 it won the JLTV contract in large part because its offering\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2016\/02\/lockheed-drops-jltv-suit-dote-knocks-reliability\/\">broke down less than half as often as uparmored Humvees<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 and in part because of Flyer\u2019s extensive field experience with the earlier versions built for the Army and Special Operation Command.<\/p>\n<p>As a team, Mansfield told me, \u201cwe\u2019ve learned a lot about reliability, we\u2019ve learned a lot about life-cycle cost, that now we can take here at Oshkosh with our extensive knowledge of all the other product lines we sell to the Army.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"iframe-container\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/pJXZHefJvis?feature=oembed\" width=\"720\" height=\"405\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/investors.saic.com\/press-release\/contract-awards\/saic-polaris-team-army-infantry-squad-vehicle\">Polaris and SAIC<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0both have plenty of defense experience.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2015\/05\/trucks-from-the-sky-polaris-pitches-dagor-for-ulcv\/\">Polaris\u2019s DAGOR<\/a>\u00a0did lose the earlier A-GMV contest to Flyer, but numerous DAGOR variants are in widespread service with Special Operations Command, the 82nd Airborne Division (shown in the video above), Canada, and other foreign customers the company can\u2019t disclose.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe DAGOR is already certified\u201d \u2014 by the Army itself \u2014 \u201cfor all of the transport requirements that the Army is looking for, whether that\u2019s internal air transport, sling-load transport, or air-drop,\u201d Polaris VP Jed Leonard told me. And each of those prior customers required tweaks to the platform or special mission equipment \u2014 heavy weapons, sensors, radios \u2014 that the DAGOR could easily accommodate.<\/p>\n<p>Integrating such high-tech kit is SAIC\u2019s core competency. While not a manufacturer itself, SAIC has done decades of integration work for the military, most extensively on the MRAP program, fitting other companies\u2019 vehicles with the sophisticated electronics that turn a truck into a weapons system. It also provides extensive maintenance and other support worldwide.<\/p>\n<p>The two companies have worked together on and off, on small projects, for years, as various customers bought Polaris vehicles and then asked SAIC to equip them for specific military missions. But the current partnership is a big step up for both.<\/p>\n<p>The odd man out is\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/media.gm.com\/media\/us\/en\/gm\/home.detail.html\/content\/Pages\/news\/us\/en\/2019\/aug\/0827-defense.html\">GM Defense<\/a><\/strong>, which giant General Motors created \u2014 in a sense, re-created \u2014 not quite two years ago after selling off most of its defense programs back in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.motortrend.com\/news\/021220-gm-2\/\">2003<\/a>. GM Defense president\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.gmdefensellc.com\/\">David Albritton<\/a>\u00a0just came aboard a year ago and has spent much of his time working with \u201cMother GM\u201d on potential joint projects and spin-offs, from self-driving car technology to hydrogen fuel cells, he told me in an interview. \u201cI\u2019m not reporting any revenues at this point,\u201d he said, although GM Defense does already have some contracts he can\u2019t disclose.<\/p>\n<p>GM\u2019s offering is the only contender without a prior track record in the military. But their ISV is derived from the Chevrolet Colorado, of which US customers have bought\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/gmauthority.com\/blog\/gm\/general-motors-sales-numbers\/chevrolet-colorado-gmc-canyon-sales-numbers\/\">more than 100,000\u00a0<em>a year<\/em><\/a>\u00a0of since 2016, giving GM staggering efficiencies of scale no competitor can match. Specifically, the GM ISV a beefed-up, militarized version of the Colorado\u2019s offroad racing variant, the ZR2, with which it shares 70 percent of the same parts \u2014 parts that are available from Chevy dealers worldwide. GM builds over 10,000 ZR2s a year: a rounding error for General Motors but a megaprogram for the Army.<\/p>\n<p>GM\u2019s scale advantage is not just in production and parts. It\u2019s also in engineering. The company spends over $7 billion a year on R&amp;D, Albritton told me, and its ISV offering includes advanced suspension systems like\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fourwheeler.com\/how-to\/suspension-brakes\/129-0601-2005-gmc-duramax-jounce-shocks\/\">jounce shocks<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.trucktrend.com\/how-to\/chassis-suspension\/1611-chevy-colorado-zr2-shocks-explained-inside-the-multimatic-dssv\/\">dynamic spooling<\/a>. GM\u2019s challenge is overcoming its inexperience in the defense sector \u2014 especially, proving it can integrate military electronics onto its civilian-derived vehicle.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-53549\" src=\"https:\/\/sites.breakingmedia.com\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2019\/03\/Army-Big-Six-2020-2024.jpg\" sizes=\"(max-width: 443px) 100vw, 443px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.breakingmedia.com\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2019\/03\/Army-Big-Six-2020-2024.jpg 443w, https:\/\/sites.breakingmedia.com\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2019\/03\/Army-Big-Six-2020-2024-300x189.jpg 300w, https:\/\/sites.breakingmedia.com\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2019\/03\/Army-Big-Six-2020-2024-210x132.jpg 210w\" alt=\"Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. graphic from US Army data\" width=\"443\" height=\"279\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>The Big Picture<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Overall, ISV is an especially interesting competition because\u00a0<em>none<\/em>\u00a0of the contenders is a classic defense prime:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.oshkoshcorp.com\/en\/brands-innovations\">Oshkosh<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.polaris.com\/en-us\/about\/\">Polaris<\/a>\u00a0both have lots of civilian customers alongside their extensive military business.<\/li>\n<li>Flyer is a subunit of a modest aerospace and defense components-builder called\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/marvingroup.com\/overview\/history\/\">Marvin Group<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>SAIC is a systems engineering and service firm rather than a traditional Original Equipment Manufacturer.<\/li>\n<li>And GM of course is one of the biggest civilian manufacturers in the country. \u201cWe make upwards of nine million cars a year,\u201d Albritton told me, each put together out of roughly 30,000 different parts.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Compare and contrast the Army\u2019s\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2019\/10\/bradley-replacement-army-risks-third-failure-in-a-row\/\">Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle<\/a>\u00a0program, which is de facto down to a single competitor \u2014 defense industry stalwart General Dynamics (which\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.motortrend.com\/news\/021220-gm-2\/\">bought<\/a>\u00a0GM\u2019s previous defense business back in 2003). ISV shows the kind of variety that the Army wants to encourage and needs to infuse innovation and competition into its programs.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, at 651 trucks \u2014 at least, in the initial 2020 contract \u2014 this is a modest program in both size and technological ambition. It\u2019s easily overshadowed by the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2019\/08\/hypersonics-army-awards-699m-to-build-first-missiles-for-a-combat-unit\/\">hypersonic missiles<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2019\/10\/bell-unveils-army-scout-helicopter-with-wings\/\">high-speed aircraft<\/a>, and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2018\/08\/from-google-cars-to-robot-tanks-army-rcv-part-2\/\">robotic tanks<\/a>\u00a0of the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2019\/09\/can-army-control-costs-of-its-new-weapons\/\">Army\u2019s Big Six priorities<\/a>. By contrast, for the predecessor competition (the one Flyer won) back in 2015, we ran\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/tag\/ulcv\/\">eight stories in three months<\/a>\u00a0because there was so little else the cash-strapped and acquisition challenged Army was buying at the time.<\/p>\n<p>But the Infantry Squad Vehicle is still an important piece of the larger Army puzzle. The Army\u2019s infantry brigades \u2014 especially its 82nd Airborne parachutists \u2014 are its most strategically deployable units, easily packed into aircraft and flown around the world overnight, while heavy armored forces cram two tanks into one C-17 or, more often, go by ship. But once the infantry arrives, it moves on foot. (Although we bet everyone in the 82nd remembers being called a \u201cspeed bump\u201d in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/apps.dtic.mil\/dtic\/tr\/fulltext\/u2\/a433941.pdf\">this Defense Science Board study<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p>The idea of ISV is a troop transport light enough to be air-dropped or, more often, delivered by helicopter. That way, the troops can land a long distance from their target \u2014 specifically, far enough their transport planes or helicopters aren\u2019t shot down by anti-aircraft missiles \u2014 and then advance quickly overnight before attacking on foot at dawn.<\/p>\n<p>We expect to see all three competing vehicles on the show floor at the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/ausa-2019\/\">Association of the US Army megaconference<\/a>\u00a0next week.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\" align=\"center\"><strong>Fuente:<\/strong><em><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2019\/10\/who-will-build-651-of-the-armys-parachuting-truck\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/breakingdefense.com<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tres equipos muy diferentes compiten para construir el Veh\u00edculo del Escuadr\u00f3n de Infanter\u00eda del Ej\u00e9rcito, un\u00a0veh\u00edculo\u00a0\u00a0lo suficientemente resistente como para lanzarse en paraca\u00eddas desde un&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[11,29],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4534"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4534"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4534\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4534"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4534"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4534"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}