\u201cIt worked great until it fell off,\u201d one US soldier, standing in the Georgia woods with his squadmates as they went over their last mock assault.<\/p>\n
See, the version of Safe Shoot<\/a> the soldiers tried\u00a0attaches to your rifle barrel. There it calculates not only your precise position but the direction in which you\u2019re aiming.<\/p>\n All the devices in an area form a wireless network, sharing their positions and orientations. Then, if the software on your gun calculates you\u2019re aiming dangerously close to another user \u2013 even if you can\u2019t see them through (for example) foliage or walls \u2013 it displays a red warning light.<\/p>\n There\u2019s also an optional warning buzzer, which you can turn down or off entirely if you\u2019re trying to be stealthy.<\/p>\n Company representatives here emphasized that the device does not<\/em>\u00a0prevent the soldier\u2019s from firing his weapon. The human being always has full control over whether or not to shoot. They also emphasized this is an early version, which they brought to the Army Expeditionary Warrior Experiment<\/a> (AEWE) here, as well as to an earlier Marine Corps event in Quantico, to get feedback from real riflemen.<\/p>\n The feedback on the device was lively, unfiltered \u2014 and mixed.<\/p>\n \u201cWhen I\u2019m in contact, it\u2019s the last thing on my mind,\u201d scoffed a visiting British section leader. The warning light is nigh-impossible to see in daylight, even in the shady woods, he told the US Army NCOs and civilians gathering feedback. In any case, he added, in a small team, you should all know each others\u2019 locations anyway, and you should never fire without positively identifying that the target in your sights truly is a hostile.<\/p>\n Maybe tanks could use it, he added. (Indeed, the Israelis offer a long-range version that goes on armored vehicles). Not infantry.<\/p>\n It\u2019s too bulky, another UK soldier said. It gets in the way.<\/p>\n What if, one of the Americans asked, instead of a separate device you mounted on your rifle, the Safe Shoot function was built into your gunsight?<\/p>\n The British soldiers said that\u2019d be much better.<\/p>\n What if friendly drones were added to the network, so the Safe Shoot device could tell you which ones not<\/em> to shoot down?<\/p>\n Yes, the section leader said. That\u2019d be useful.<\/p>\n Now, the UK participates in the AEWE exercise \u2013 and the US sends soldiers to the equivalent in the UK \u2013 precisely to give each Army an alternative point of view. It\u2019s worth noting that the British Army prides itself on a tradition of marksmanship more than a century old, decades of experience in counterinsurgency from Iraq to Ireland, and, in many quarters, a disdain for American dependence on gadgetry.<\/p>\n US soldiers\u2019 reactions were more enthusiastic. They, too, told the exercise observers they\u2019d rather have Safe Shoot as a feature built into their existing gunsight rather than as a separate device: Getting it attached to rifles already festooned with scopes and rangefingers, and getting it to stay attached, were chronic problems. (Not everybody got the message, a company rep told me, that you have to mount it on the left<\/em> side of your Picatinny Rail). And there weren\u2019t enough to issue one to every soldier in the exercise. But even so, one American squad leader told me, he and his men definitely found it helpful to have this extra layer of protection against friendly-fire incidents.<\/p>\n That\u2019s a topic the US military takes very<\/em> seriously. After an American squad rushed a building occupied by \u201cenemy\u201d roleplayers, the air filled with green clouds from smoke grenades and the high-pitched whine of soldiers\u2019 MILES gear \u2013 a kind of militarized laser tag \u2013 telling them they\u2019d been shot. An observer-sergeant dissected the squad\u2019s performance afterward. You had your SAW<\/a> machinegunner in the wrong position, firing past your assault element, the sergeant said, and he didn\u2019t<\/em> have Safe Shoot. It\u2019s entirely possible he<\/em> shot some of you, not the enemy.<\/p>\n This problem is only going to get worse if we fight the Russians<\/a>, one Fort Benning expert told me over the whine of MILES alarms: They\u2019ve started using a camouflage pattern almost indistinguishable from ours.<\/p>\n Over 25 percent of soldiers killed or wounded in recent wars were hit by \u201cfriendly fire\u201d by their own side, former IDF Brig. Gen. Amir Nadan<\/a> told our Israeli correspondent, Arie Egozi<\/a>. Nadan, who commanded elite paratroopers and units on the volatile northern border with Lebanon and Syria, is now\u00a0Safe Shoots\u2019 CEO.<\/p>\n The company offers versions of the underlying technology, called Green Shield<\/a>, for ground vehicles, helicopters and drones, as well as infantry soldiers on foot, Nadan said. (There\u2019s even a version being marketed to hunters<\/a> in the US). That allows the whole force to form a network that alerts them when they\u2019re accidentally aiming at one another. \u201cOnce the infantry, who are practically the most venerable elements, are identified,\u201d he told Arie, \u201call the other units, weapon and forces will have to consider and refer to their position.\u201d<\/p>\n The goal isn\u2019t to slow operations down, but to speed them up without<\/em> increasing the risk of friendly fire. \u201cBy eliminating the need to hesitate when making shoot\/don\u2019t shoot decisions, the Safe Shoot [device] offers greater freedom of operation,\u201d Nadan said. \u201cIn general, knowing where your troops are significantly improves overall situational awareness, command flexibility and effectiveness.\u201d<\/p>\n The company\u2019s already working to miniaturize the system even further, its representatives at Fort Benning told me, showing me a sample of the next-gen system. That version splits the current rifle-mounted gadget into two smaller devices: a seven-ounce transponder worn on the soldier\u2019s vest, which broadcasts his location; and a tiny gadget on the rifle barrel, weighing less than two ounces (50 grams), that determines exactly where your weapon is aiming.<\/p>\n For now, the Safe Shoot reps acknowledged, their device does depend on GPS \u2013 or its Russian equivalent, GLONASS<\/a>. That\u2019s a major limitation, because the Global Positioning System signal can be blocked by enemy radio-frequency jamming<\/a> or by physical obstacles. Here at Benning, for example, it didn\u2019t work\u00a0inside<\/em> the reinforced-concrete buildings of the mock village, only in the woods.<\/p>\n But the company is working on pulling together data from a \u201cwide range of sensors,\u201d Nadan said, so future versions won\u2019t rely on GPS. For the US version specifically, the goal is to integrate it with the current Nett Warrior<\/a> network, the new FWS-I<\/a> digital gunsight, the future Integrated Visual Augmentation System<\/a> (IVAS) goggles, and an overarching Adaptative Squad Architecture<\/a> now in development. That will eliminate the need for a separate gadget on the soldier\u2019s rifle, they say, and allow the device to tap into all the new Assured Position, Navigation, & Timing<\/a> (APNT) technologies the Army\u2019s vigorously developing as alternatives to GPS<\/a>.<\/p>\n Ultimately, one company rep told me, Safe Shoot won\u2019t be a physical thing at all. It\u2019ll be software, just one more app on the soldier\u2019s standard-issue electronics.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/UK-troops-at-Fort-Benning-AEWE-IMG_7058-1024x768-1.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/armamento.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/Safe-Shoot-device-@-Fort-Benning-AEWE-IMG_6759-1024x768-1.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/armamento2.jpg\")