{"id":7293,"date":"2021-02-23T09:03:21","date_gmt":"2021-02-23T12:03:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/?p=7293"},"modified":"2021-02-23T09:03:21","modified_gmt":"2021-02-23T12:03:21","slug":"revision-de-sistemas-de-armas-portatiles-us-army","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/?p=7293","title":{"rendered":"Revisi\u00f3n de sistemas de armas port\u00e1tiles – US Army"},"content":{"rendered":"

El US Army contin\u00faa el proceso integral de revisi\u00f3n de sus armas port\u00e1tiles, con el objetivo de disponer de una fuerza m\u00e1s letal para los pr\u00f3ximos conflictos. En ese marco, se avanza en Programas como \u201cNEXT GENERATION SQUAD WEAPONS<\/em>\u201d. El mismo incluye el desarrollo de una plataforma modular, con grandes innovaciones, en nuevo calibre 6,8x51mm, que pueda adaptarse f\u00e1cilmente para cumplir con las funciones de Fusil de Asalto y Ametralladora Liviana para el grupo de tiradores. Tambi\u00e9n se analiza el reemplazo de la ametralladora mediana (Cal 7,62mm), as\u00ed como el lanzagranadas semiautom\u00e1tico de 40mm.<\/p>\n

\n

The Army is continuing to overhaul its small arms weapons portfolio in hopes of better preparing its troops for future warfare.<\/p>\n

The service has been making strides in its M4 carbine and M249 squad automatic weapon replacement efforts while also looking to adopt new products to boost soldier lethality.<\/p>\n

In the next-generation squad weapons program, leaders are pushing through the COVID-19 pandemic and moving onto the second prototype phase, according to the service\u2019s product manager for the effort.<\/p>\n

Lt. Col. Jason Bohannon said the service has already completed the first iteration of prototype testing, which was the diagnostic test. The next round of testing is slated to kick off in February and run through June.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat was primarily to ensure that the vendors had a common understanding of all the tests they were going to undergo,\u201d he said in an interview. \u201cThen we go into what we call prototype test No. 2, which is the for-record test. That will go through the summer.\u201d<\/p>\n

Three bidders are competing in the program. In August 2019, the service awarded other transaction authority agreements to Sig Sauer, General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems and Textron Systems, which are all providing prototypes for soldier evaluation. As part of the competition, the companies are bidding their solutions for a new 6.8 mm round that will replace the current 5.56 mm NATO ammunition.<\/p>\n

The Army is holding both technical tests and soldier \u201ctouchpoints\u201d to put the weapons through their paces, Bohannon noted. Soldiers at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, and Fort Drum, New York, have been trying out the prototypes to provide hands-on feedback. Bohannon said the service hopes to have 300 to 500 personnel participate in the soldier touchpoints.<\/p>\n

\u201cAt the end of the day, they\u2019re really determining or giving feedback on if they believe the weapon system is operationally effective or not,\u201d he said. \u201cWill it increase or decrease their performance?\u201d<\/p>\n

Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, the service has not had to curtail its soldier touchpoints, he noted.<\/p>\n

\u201cEverybody takes all the proper precautions and spacing,\u201d he said. \u201cWe have not reduced the number of our soldiers. If anything, we\u2019ve increased the number of soldiers\u201d involved.<\/p>\n

Wayne Prender, senior vice president of Textron\u2019s applied technologies and advanced programs, said the company will be making improvements to its offering based on information gained from the soldier touchpoints, but declined to provide specific details on how it plans to enhance its prototype in the next round.<\/p>\n

Textron has been paying close attention to how soldiers interact with the weapon to make adjustments, he noted.<\/p>\n

\u201cSoldier touchpoints have been very valuable especially in the area of ergonomics, hand placement, [and] trigger pull,\u201d Prender told reporters during a virtual Association of the United States Army media roundtable in October. \u201cWhat they say, what they don\u2019t say, what we observe, are all elements that are then rolled into our weapon system.\u201d<\/p>\n

Textron is offering cased telescoped ammunition in hopes that it will result in weight savings for the service.<\/p>\n

Sig Sauer said it is making changes to its accessories package as it moves along in the competition. It is also conducting manufacturing rehearsals to ensure that it would be able to quickly transition to production and fielding, the company said in a statement. Sig Sauer\u2019s bid is based on its MCX firearms line and has a folding stock capability.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor our second phase submission we have used the various testing opportunities afforded to us by the U.S. Army such as soldier touchpoints and environmental testing to refine our platforms,\u201d said Robby Johnson, Sig Sauer\u2019s vice president for product management for defense and law enforcement. \u201cIn this period our accessories package for the weapons has seen the greatest changes, and through this we\u2019ve vastly improved the soldier ergonomics.\u201d<\/p>\n

Sig Sauer will continue to evolve these platforms beyond the second-phase submission, he added<\/p>\n

As of press time, General Dynamics had not responded to requests for comment about its offering.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the Army is picking a new fire control system to accompany the next-generation squad weapons. Last year, the service downselected the competition to L3Harris Technologies and Vortex Optics. The companies delivered their products in December, Bohannon said.<\/p>\n

The Army plans on fielding the fire control at the same time as the weapon, he said. The prototype test phase for the system was slated to begin in December and go through April 2021, with a production award planned for July 2021.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere will be a period of time where we conduct a source selection, but it mirrors a lot of the same characteristics of the weapon competition,\u201d he said. \u201cWe still conduct soldier touchpoints, we still have separate technical testing, and all that information goes to a selection team.\u201d<\/p>\n

That team will include an operational general officer, rather than an acquisition officer, he noted.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s somebody who\u2019s got loads of operational experience,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

The Army is looking into potentially replacing its M240 machine gun for the conventional force as well, said Col. Rhett Thompson, soldier requirements division director. Special Operations Command has been examining a .338 Norma Magnum machine gun from Sig Sauer to replace its own M240s.<\/p>\n

The Army is conducting a 36-month Platoon Arms and Ammunition Configuration Study to determine if the service should pursue a next-generation machine gun for its conventional forces, Thompson said in an interview. The report will be similar to the Small Arms Ammunition Configuration Study, which helped officials decide on abandoning the 5.56 NATO round for its M4 and M249 in favor of the 6.8 mm caliber and pave the way forward for future weapons at the squad level.<\/p>\n

Leaders are expected to make a decision on whether or not to replace the M240 when the platoon-level report is completed in fiscal year 2024, Thompson said. Similar to the small arms study, this will be \u201cthreat driven,\u201d meaning that the service will inform its requirements based on what soldiers may encounter on the battlefield. The Army plans to use information from the intelligence community to help inform its capability gaps, he noted.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe PAAC study is really what we\u2019re going to use to inform our decision in terms of the mobility, survivability, durability of the weapon and lethality,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Col. Scott Madore, project manager for soldier lethality, said in December the Army will be tracking the performance of the 6.8 mm ammo in the next-generation squad weapon program as it seeks to make its decision. The M240 uses the 7.2 mm round.<\/p>\n

The service will need to examine how a new machine gun may affect the formation as well, he noted.<\/p>\n

\u201cThose decisions pivot off of the outcomes of the next-gen squad weapon program,\u201d he said during the National Defense Industrial Association\u2019s virtual Joint Armaments, Robotics and Munitions Digital Experience conference in November. \u201cOnce we have a good understanding or see the demonstrated performance of the 6.8 mm in the next-gen squad automatic rifle, that would determine, do we need a next-gen machine gun beyond the 6.8 mm capability?\u201d<\/p>\n

The Army wants a new grenade launcher as well, according to Lt. Col. Pete Stambersky, the service\u2019s product manager for individual weapons. A request for information for a Precision Grenadier System was released in October.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is going to be different than the XM25 in several different ways,\u201d Stambersky said, referring to the Army\u2019s previous attempt to field a new grenade launcher dubbed the XM25 Counter Defilade Target Engagement. \u201cWe\u2019re going to learn from our past mistakes, and \u2026 we are going to be focused on a soldier-centered design, which will be integral to the PGS development. Grabbing that soldier feedback and what works for them is something we didn\u2019t necessarily do a few years back.\u201d<\/p>\n

The future system is expected to have a range of 1,000 meters and variable magnification, which allows users to choose the level of magnification in the scope, he noted.<\/p>\n

According to the October RFI, the Army envisions a semi-automatic system that weighs no more than 14.5 pounds and has an ambidextrous configuration.<\/p>\n

Stambersky said the service was planning to host an industry day in December or January to discuss the requirements with industry, but did not provide a timeline for a request for proposals.<\/p>\n

Additionally, the Army is expanding its interest in remote weapon stations. David Oatley, product director for crew served weapons, said his office is improving the Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station while also looking for potential new systems. The product allows soldiers to shoot targets without leaving their armored vehicles.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe see an increase in demand for that, and we don\u2019t see it going anywhere anytime soon,\u201d Oatley said. \u201cWe\u2019re always interested in finding out more about what\u2019s available in that space.\u201d<\/p>\n

Oatley said his office is not limited to just CROWS, but also works on other remote weapon station systems and is able to integrate them onto various platforms.<\/p>\n

The office plans to hold a range week at the end of fiscal year 2021.The event will be open to industry looking to demonstrate any systems that may be suitable for the crew served weapons portfolio, he noted. Soldiers will be available to evaluate products for industry and provide feedback.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat event will provide benefits to both the government and industry,\u201d Oatley said. \u201cIt helps inform us about the state of technology and what\u2019s available and helps us inform requirements and inform some additional analysis we may have on where we can take weapons in the future.\u201d<\/p>\n

Fuente:<\/strong> https:\/\/www.nationaldefensemagazine.org<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

El US Army contin\u00faa el proceso integral de revisi\u00f3n de sus armas port\u00e1tiles, con el objetivo de disponer de una fuerza m\u00e1s letal para los… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7294,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[18],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7293"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7293"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7293\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7295,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7293\/revisions\/7295"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fie.undef.edu.ar\/ceptm\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}